From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2002
290 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

89632

January 31, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Byron K. Brown, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized possession of controlled substances. The misbehavior report stated that, during a search of petitioner's cell, approximately 70 grams of a leafy substance, later identified as marihuana, were found in a coat pocket. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at the ensuing disciplinary hearing in the form of the laboratory test results that were positive for the presence of marihuana, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report and whose search of petitioner's cell led to the discovery of the marihuana (see, Matter of Rosario v. Selsky, 266 A.D.2d 656; Matter of Jandura v. Selsky, 251 A.D.2d 721). Petitioner's unsupported assertion that the marihuana found in his cell had been "planted" there by correction officers presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Roman v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 519; Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin, 216 A.D.2d 617). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Brown v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2002
290 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Brown v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BYRON K. BROWN, Petitioner, v. DANIEL A. SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 31, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 638

Citing Cases

Smith v. Selsky

The second officer testified that he conducted a NIK test on the substance, the results of which were…

In the Matter of Diaz v. Goord

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author and the documentary evidence,…