From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 11, 2008
269 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-7212.

February 11, 2008.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 04-1335, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court's November 20, 2007 order and requests that the court summarily affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Brown v. Nicholson, 04-1335, 2007 WL 470196 (Jan. 29, 2007). Milton Brown has not responded.

This case was stayed pending the court's disposition in Sunders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881 (Fed. Cir. 2007) and its companion case Simmons v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 892 (Fed. Cir. 2007). In Sunders, this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. Id. at 891.

The Secretary concedes that the only issue raised in this appeal is identical to the issue decided in Sunders and Simmons. Under these circumstances, summary affirmance is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.


Summaries of

Brown v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Feb 11, 2008
269 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Peake

Case Details

Full title:Milton BROWN, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

269 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2008)