From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Mohr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2015
Case No. 2:13-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-006

03-11-2015

STEVEN S. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTOR MOHR, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kemp

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Magistrate Judge Terrence P. Kemp's Report & Recommendation ("R & R"). (ECF No. 109.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion for an order to protect plaintiff's legal papers (ECF No. 64 as supplemented by ECF No. 72 and 73) be denied as moot. Further, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the motions for an entry of default (ECF No. 78), to dismiss (ECF No. 79), for sanctions (ECF No. 90), and to supplement (ECF No. 95 and 102) be denied and that the motion to stay a decision on the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 94) be denied as moot. Finally, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court decline to consider the issues raised in Mr. Brown's motion for an order directing defendants to debit his prison account for copies (ECF No. 82) and that this motion be removed from this Court's pending motions list.

No party has objected to the R & R and the time period for filing objections has past. The R & R of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the R & R within fourteen days results in a "waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (ECF No. 109 at 9.)

The Court has reviewed the R & R of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the R & R of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Mohr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2015
Case No. 2:13-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Brown v. Mohr

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN S. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTOR MOHR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-006 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Smith

Ramada Franchise Sys., Inc. v. Baroda Enter., LLC, 220 F.R.D. 303, 305 (N.D. Ohio 2004); see also Brown v.…