Summary
adopting the reasoning of the dissenting opinion
Summary of this case from Winrow v. Discovery Ins. Co.Opinion
No. 640A03
Filed 2 April 2004
Costs — attorney fees — amount of judgment — costs and prejudgment interest — addition to compensatory damages
The decision of the Court of Appeals that the trial court improperly added court costs of $435 and prejudgment interest of $669.76 to the jury verdict of $9,500 in compensatory damages to find that the judgment obtained exceeded the $10,000 limit for awarding attorney fees under N.C.G.S. § 6-21.1 is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that, although the trial court erred in adding discretionary court costs to the verdict, pre-judgment interest of $669.76 should have been added because it is automatically added to the award to compensate the prevailing party, and the $10,000 limit was thus exceeded even if court costs are not added to the verdict.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 161 N.C. App. ___, 588 S.E.2d 71 (2003), reversing a judgment signed 28 September 2002 nunc pro tune by Judge Wiley F. Bowen in Superior Court, Columbus County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 March 2004.
T. Craig Wright for plaintiff-appellee. Russ, Worth, Cheatwood Hancox, by Philip H. Cheatwood, for defendant-appellant. Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, L.L.P., by Robert H. Griffin and Jaye E. Bingham, on behalf of Nationwide Insurance Company, amicus curiae.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.