Summary
In Brown v. McGrew, No. EDCV 12-1479-SVW(JPR), 2013 WL 6512948, a prisoner filed a § 2241 petition, complaining that he did not receive the DHO Report until after the expiration of the 15-day period set forth in BOP Program Statement 5270.09.
Summary of this case from Gormsen v. Snyder-NorrisOpinion
Case No. EDCV 12-1479-SVW (JPR)
12-09-2013
QUENTIN L. BROWN Petitioner, v. L. McGREW, Warden, Respondent.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SERVED BY FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE PREPAID, TO Petitioner (OR PARTIES) AT THEIR RESPECTIVE MOST RECENT ADDRESS OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION ON THIS DATE. __________________
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. On April 5, 2013, Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, in which he simply reargues portions of the Petition and reply. Having determined de novo those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner objected, the Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.
_____________________
STEPHEN V. WILSON
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE