In Rice et al. v. Brown, 1 Kan. App. 646, 42 P. 396, the court thought it significant that "both parties (the original contractor and the owner) seem to treat the house as completed."
Summary of this case from Allison v. SchulerNo. A134387.
February 28, 2007.
Cases Affirmed Without Opinion.
In Rice et al. v. Brown, 1 Kan. App. 646, 42 P. 396, the court thought it significant that "both parties (the original contractor and the owner) seem to treat the house as completed."
Summary of this case from Allison v. SchulerFull title:Rice et al and Brown v. City of Monmouth et al
Court:Oregon Court of Appeals
Date published: Feb 28, 2007
The illustrations presented by defendants in support of a view of substantial completion do not parallel the…