From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 12, 1988
519 So. 2d 136 (La. 1988)

Summary

In Broussard, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled, in a memorandum decision, that blanket production of attorney's and insurer's files is not permissible, but that a request must comport with La. Code Civ.P. art. 1422.

Summary of this case from Carter v. Texas Industries

Opinion

No. 88-CC-0073.

February 12, 1988.

In re United States Fire Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW87-1282; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. "J", No. 86-51284-J.


Writ granted. The judgments of the court of appeal and the district court are reversed. Blanket production of the attorney's and insurer's files is not permitted. The plaintiff is free to renew her discovery requests upon identifying the documents or types of documents she seeks. If any such requested documents are those prepared in anticipation of litigation, those documents should not be produced unless the plaintiff makes the showing required by La.Civ. Code Proc. art. 1422. In all events, documents which contain the opinions, conclusions, theories or mental impressions of the defendant's attorney as well ass privileged communications are not discoverable.


Summaries of

Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 12, 1988
519 So. 2d 136 (La. 1988)

In Broussard, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled, in a memorandum decision, that blanket production of attorney's and insurer's files is not permissible, but that a request must comport with La. Code Civ.P. art. 1422.

Summary of this case from Carter v. Texas Industries
Case details for

Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY BROUSSARD v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 12, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 136 (La. 1988)

Citing Cases

Stelly v. Mouret

La. Code Civ.Proc. art. 1422. However, the claimants must first describe, in general terms, the types of…

Squealer Feeds v. Pickering

Keeping in mind the purpose and scope of the work product privilege, we conclude that a claimant is not…