From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broomfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 1997
698 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-1072

September 10, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; John E. Fennelly, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-788 CFA.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Connie Broomfield was convicted on her plea of nolo contendere to two counts of sale of cocaine and two counts of possession of cocaine, which were charged in two circuit court cases. Her convictions and sentences are affirmed, but the costs and fees assessed against her must be reversed.

The costs included in the written sentence entered in case number 96-788 are reversed as being contrary to the oral pronouncement at sentencing that costs and fees were waived. The trial court's oral pronouncement controls over the written sentence. See Glaubius v. State, 675 So.2d 211 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), approved in part, quashed in part on other grounds, 688 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1997).

The public defender's liens in both cases must be reversed because the appellant was not advised of her right to a hearing on the amount of the liens, as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On remand, the trial court is directed to apprise appellant of her right to contest the amount of the liens and to set the matter for hearing if she chooses to exercise that right. See Brown v. State, 682 So.2d 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Broomfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 1997
698 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Broomfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE BROOMFIELD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 10, 1997

Citations

698 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Rinderer v. State

The general rule is that when there is a discrepancy between the written sentence and the oral pronouncement,…

Louisgeste v. State

As the oral pronouncement of sentence controls over the written sentence, appellant's sentence must be…