From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 1991
577 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2279.

April 3, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


In this case in which the defendant was found guilty of DUI manslaughter, the jury was instructed that the presence of ".10 per cent or more by weight of alcohol in the [defendant's] blood . . . shall be prima facie evidence that the person was under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired." We reverse.

We must follow the dictates of the Florida Supreme Court which recently has unequivocally held that such an instruction is reversible error. Wilhelm v. State, 568 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990).

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 3, 1991
577 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD S. BROOKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 3, 1991

Citations

577 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Dejerez v. State

PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the authority of Wilhelm v. State, 568 So.2d 1 (Fla.…