From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No. c10-01873 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. c10-01873 SBA

03-21-2013

ELLEN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual, ADVISORY FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. a Corporation, TRADERIGHT SECURITIES, INC. a Corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20. Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI Mark L. Venardi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff BALDWIN LAW GROUP Christopher Mader, Esq. Attorney for Defendants


STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff Ellen Brooks ("Brooks") and Defendants Ruthe Gomez and Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") hereby stipulate that Defendants shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint by March 25, 2013.

LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI

______________

Mark L. Venardi, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

BALDWIN LAW GROUP

_____________

Christopher Mader, Esq.

Attorney for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________

Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong


Summaries of

Brooks v. Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No. c10-01873 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Brooks v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual, ADVISORY FINANCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. c10-01873 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)