From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co.

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 366 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 503.

Decided May 20, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 376 F.2d 578, reversed.

Edwin F. Russell and Barbara M. Suchow for Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of the State of New York, petitioners.

Martin N. Erck and Frank S. Troidl for respondent Humble Oil Refining Co.; Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson, and Donald K. Young for respondent Hunt; Sherman S. Poland for respondent Coates; Robert V. Smith for respondent Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.; J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for respondent Clark Fuel Producing Co.; William K. Tell, Jr., William R. Slye, and James D. Annett for respondent Texaco Inc.; Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May, and Francis H. Caskin for respondent Sun Oil Co.; Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for respondent Sunray DX Oil Co.; Richard F. Remmers for respondent Sohio Petroleum Co.; and Kiel Boone for respondent Cox.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., ante, p. 9.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co.

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 366 (1968)
Case details for

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. ET AL. v . STANDARD OIL CO. OF TEXAS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 20, 1968

Citations

391 U.S. 366 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Stone

In addition, the interception and divulgence of the private communications constituted conduct rather than…

GTE California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Consequently, the statute will be sustained if it furthers a "substantial governmental interest," which is…