From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooke T. Oswego Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Terri T.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

892 CAF 18-00088

09-27-2019

In the MATTER OF BROOKE T. Oswego County Department of Social Services,Petitioner–Respondent; v. Terri T., Respondent-Appellant.

ROBERT GALLAMORE, OSWEGO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. JEFFERY G. TOMPKINS, CAMDEN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. WALTER J. BURKARD, MANLIUS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.


ROBERT GALLAMORE, OSWEGO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JEFFERY G. TOMPKINS, CAMDEN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

WALTER J. BURKARD, MANLIUS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b, respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject child on the ground of permanent neglect and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to petitioner. We affirm.

Contrary to the mother's contention, petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that it made the requisite diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen her relationship with the child (see Matter of Soraya S. [Kathryne T.] , 158 A.D.3d 1305, 1305–1306, 70 N.Y.S.3d 737 [4th Dept. 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 908, 2018 WL 2728503 [2018] ; Matter of Holden W. [Kelly W.] , 81 A.D.3d 1390, 1390, 917 N.Y.S.2d 589 [4th Dept. 2011], lv denied 16 N.Y.3d 712, 2011 WL 1675781 [2011] ). Contrary to the mother's further contention, she was not denied effective assistance of counsel (see Matter of Deanna E.R. [Latisha M.] , 169 A.D.3d 691, 692, 93 N.Y.S.3d 375 [2d Dept. 2019] ; Matter of Kelsey R.K. [John J.K.] , 113 A.D.3d 1139, 1140, 978 N.Y.S.2d 560 [4th Dept. 2014], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 866, 2014 WL 1362321 [2014] ). Finally, Family Court did not err in failing, sua sponte, to appoint a guardian ad litem for the mother (see Matter of Leala T. , 55 A.D.3d 1007, 1008, 871 N.Y.S.2d 731 [3d Dept. 2008] ; cf. Matter of Jesten J.F. [Ruth P.S.] , 167 A.D.3d 1527, 1527–1529 [4th Dept. 2018] ).


Summaries of

Brooke T. Oswego Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Terri T.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Brooke T. Oswego Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Terri T.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF BROOKE T. Oswego County Department of Social…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
107 N.Y.S.3d 755

Citing Cases

Oswego Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Seth H. (In re Carter H.)

The father failed to "demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's…

Monroe Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Carl B. (In re Carl B.)

His visits with the child were sporadic, at best, and the father missed medical and therapeutic visits for…