From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronson v. Naji

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 11 - 260 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11 - 260 Johnstown

01-25-2012

PURCELL BRONSON, Plaintiff, v. MUHAMMAD NAJI, MARIA LEAHY, and MANDY VARNER, Defendants.


District Judge Kim R. Gibson

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On November 10, 2011, a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was filed in the above captioned case, which was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules 72.C and 72.D.

The magistrate judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 17, 2011, (ECF No. 3) recommending that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee, with the right of Plaintiff to reopen by paying the full $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address and was advised that he had until December 5, 2011, to file written objections. Plaintiff filed objections on December 12, 14, and 30, 2011. (ECF Nos. 7, 8, 10.) The objections do not undermine the conclusions set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may reopen this case by paying the full $350.00 filing fee within sixty (60) days.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) dated November 17, 2011, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

_________________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge

cc: Purcell Bronson

AF-8163

SCI Houtzdale

PO Box 1000

Houtzdale, PA 16698


Summaries of

Bronson v. Naji

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 11 - 260 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Bronson v. Naji

Case Details

Full title:PURCELL BRONSON, Plaintiff, v. MUHAMMAD NAJI, MARIA LEAHY, and MANDY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11 - 260 Johnstown (W.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)