From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronson v. Lamb

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 12, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-225 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-225.

March 12, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2010, after the Plaintiff, Purcell Bronson, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the Plaintiff until February 26, 2010, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order granting Plaintiffs application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is vacated;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given until April 12, 2010 , in which to pay the filing fee and if he fails to do so, the Court will enter an order dismissing the action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Bronson v. Lamb

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 12, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-225 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Bronson v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:PURCELL BRONSON, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL LAMB, Prothontary; KATE BARKMAN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-225 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2010)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Corr. Med. Serv.

Other courts in this circuit have granted plaintiffs in similar situations a limited amount of time to pay…