From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broder v. Broder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 858 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided June 9, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, BEATRICE SHAINSWIT, J.

Leonard C. Shalleck for appellant.

Robert Z. Dobrish for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative. No complaint or responsive pleading ever having been served or filed in the action commenced in 1979, plaintiff was within her rights to discontinue that action by notice. (CPLR 3217, subd [a], par 1; Battaglia v Battaglia, 59 N.Y.2d 778.)

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Broder v. Broder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 858 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Broder v. Broder

Case Details

Full title:JANE BRODER, Respondent, v. ALVIN BRODER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 9, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 858 (N.Y. 1983)
465 N.Y.S.2d 926
452 N.E.2d 1254

Citing Cases

Harvey v. Harvey

The defendant's counterclaim is a nullity because it was not interposed through the service of an answer to a…

Meilak v. Meilak

Indeed, defendant, in his original answer to the complaint in this action, challenged plaintiff's grounds for…