From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brockington v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 3, 2014
119 A.D.3d 1372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-07-3

In the Matter of Gerald BROCKINGTON, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent–Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered January 23, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Zainab A. Chaudhry of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered January 23, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Zainab A. Chaudhry of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his application for release to parole supervision in June 2011. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, subsequent to that denial and during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board of Parole in June 2013 and was again denied release. Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Sanchez v. Evans, 111 A.D.3d 1315, 1315, 974 N.Y.S.2d 832;Matter of Robles v. Evans, 100 A.D.3d 1455, 1455, 953 N.Y.S.2d 534). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply ( see Sanchez, 111 A.D.3d at 1315, 974 N.Y.S.2d 832;see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714–715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brockington v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 3, 2014
119 A.D.3d 1372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Brockington v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Gerald BROCKINGTON, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 3, 2014

Citations

119 A.D.3d 1372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5093
988 N.Y.S.2d 512

Citing Cases

Hill v. Annucci

MEMORANDUM:Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the…

Hill v. Annucci (In re Matter of Hill)

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the…