From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Mar 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2586 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2586

03-21-2018

DAMIONE BROCK v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL


CHIEF JUDGE HICKS

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus that attacked his state court convictions on the grounds that the state courts improperly denied his motion to suppress based on Fourth Amendment arguments. Petitioner argues that the State knowingly used altered surveillance video evidence at the suppression hearing. He has filed a Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 13) that asks the court to order the district attorney to provide the court with the surveillance video evidence for consideration at a hearing. The undersigned has recently issued a Report and Recommendation that explained that the claims asserted in the petition are barred from habeas review under the doctrine of Stone v. Powell, 96 S.Ct. 3037 (1976). Accordingly, the Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 13) is denied.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this 21st day of March, 2018.

/s/ _________

Mark L. Hornsby

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brock v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Mar 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2586 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Brock v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:DAMIONE BROCK v. N. BURL CAIN, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2586 (W.D. La. Mar. 21, 2018)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Vannoy

Fourth Amendment violations are not cognizable on federal habeas corpus review. Brock v. Cain, No.…