From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brocade Commc'ns Sys., Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 25, 2013
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK

03-25-2013

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVEN HWANG, an individual, Defendants and Counterclaimants.

ALLEN J. RUBY (STATE BAR NO. 47109) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825) MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Menlo Park, California 94025 DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC


ALLEN J. RUBY (STATE BAR NO. 47109)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
FABIO E. MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
Menlo Park, California 94025
DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and
FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL EXHIBITS A AND B TO

MINGRONE DECLARATION IN

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS'

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS

SYSTEMS, INC.'S AND FOUNDRY

NETWORKS, LLC'S OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT A10 NETWORKS,

INC.'S UNAUTHORIZED

"OBJECTIONS" (D.I. 570) TO

BROCADE'S IDENTIFICATION OF

CLAIMS FOR TRIAL


Judge: Honorable Lucy H. Koh

The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc.'s and Foundry Networks LLC's ("Plaintiffs") Administrative Motion for Leave to file under seal the following identified documents attached to the Declaration of Denise M. Mingrone in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant A10 Networks, Inc. ("A10") Unauthorized Objections to Brocade's Identification of Claims for Trial, and having found good cause to do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED.

The Plaintiffs may publically file under seal the following identified documents in their entirety:

• Exhibits A and B attached to the Declaration of Denise M. Mingrone in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant A10 Networks, Inc. ("A10") Unauthorized Objections to Brocade's Identification of Claims for Trial. These documents are:
i. Ex. A: Plaintiffs' May 31, 2011 Identification of Trade Secrets Pursuant to Court Order
ii. Ex. B: February 24, 2012 Deposition Transcript of Bryan Meckley

The request for Ex. B is not narrowly tailored to information that is appropriate for sealing, specifically, information for which Brocade has shown particularized harm. The request is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

Paul S. Grewal

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brocade Commc'ns Sys., Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 25, 2013
Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Brocade Commc'ns Sys., Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)