Opinion
2001-09083
Argued April 28, 2003.
June 23, 2003.
In an action, inter alia, to recover on a debt, the defendant, Metropolitan Electric Manufacturing Company, and the nonparty Louis Silvestre appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated September 10, 2001, as granted the defendant's motion to compel Louis Silvestre, in his capacity as acting President of the defendant, to pay certain legal fees allegedly incurred on behalf of the defendant, and denied that branch of Silvestre's cross motion which was to disqualify the law firm of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky Popeo, P.C., from representing the defendant.
Galison Galison, Mineola, N.Y. (Edward Galison of counsel), for defendant-appellant and nonparty-appellant.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris Glovsky Popeo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Robert I. Bodian of counsel), nonparty-respondent pro se.
Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., BARRY A. COZIER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal by the defendant, Metropolitan Electric Manufacturing Company, is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal by the nonparty Louis Silvestre from so much of the order as granted the defendant's motion to compel him, in his capacity as acting President of the defendant, to pay certain legal fees is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the nonparty-respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
This appeal is one of several that have arisen from a bitter dispute between competing family factions over certain corporate holdings established by now-deceased brothers, James Shelley and Joseph Shelley (see Artisan Stainless Specialties v. Broadway Equities, 294 A.D.2d 385; Shelley v. Shelley, 299 A.D.2d 405; Shelley v. Dixon Equities, 300 A.D.2d 566). In this case, the defendant, Metropolitan Electric Manufacturing Company (hereinafter MEMCO), ownership of which is reportedly equally split between the factions, was sued by the plaintiff, Broadway Equities, to recover more than $1,800,000 in alleged loans. Broadway Equities reportedly is controlled by the James Shelley faction. Concerned that this action was improperly being used by the James Shelley faction to the detriment of the Joseph Shelley faction, and that MEMCO was not being adequately represented, members of the Joseph Shelley faction successfully moved for permission to retain counsel to defend MEMCO at corporate expense. When Louis Silvestre, acting President of MEMCO and a member of the James Shelley faction by marriage, refused to pay legal fees allegedly owed to Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky Popeo, P.C. (hereinafter the Mintz Firm), for services rendered on behalf of MEMCO, MEMCO moved to compel Silvestre to pay the outstanding fees from MEMCO funds. The Supreme Court granted the motion, and also denied Silvestri's independent cross motion, made by his attorney, inter alia, to disqualify the Mintz Firm, resulting in this appeal by MEMCO and Silvestre.
Silvestre, in his capacity as acting President of MEMCO, was ordered to approve payment of legal fees out of MEMCO funds. He is not personally aggrieved, and thus he is not a proper appellant (see Scopelliti v. Town of New Castle, 92 N.Y.2d 944; Katz v. Katz, 279 A.D.2d 454; Warm v. State of New York, 265 A.D.2d 546; see also Matter of Lee, 294 A.D.2d 366). Therefore, his appeal from so much of the order as directed him to approve payment of legal fees out of MEMCO funds must be dismissed.
Silvestre lacks standing to seek the disqualification of the Mintz Firm, and therefore that branch of his cross motion which sought its disqualification was properly denied (see Ogilvie v. McDonald's Corp., 294 A.D.2d 550; Vanarthros v. St. Francis Hosp., 234 A.D.2d 450).
MEMCO is not aggrieved by the portion of the order directing the payment of legal fees, as it was MEMCO which moved for the relief granted by the order appealed from. A party that prevails is not aggrieved (see T.D. v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 91 N.Y.2d 860; LoCirico v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 276 A.D.2d 755; Roebuck v. Roebuck, 35 A.D.2d 714). While the James Shelley faction may perceive itself as being aggrieved by the order, MEMCO is an independent corporate entity. MEMCO moved for relief which was granted, and thus MEMCO's appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Residents for Future of Briarcliff Manor v. Village of Briarcliff Manor Bd. of Trustees, 239 A.D.2d 350). Further, MEMCO is not aggrieved by the denial of the application to disqualify the Mintz Firm, as MEMCO never joined in Silvestre's cross motion (see Monroe v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 281 A.D.2d 605; Papa v. Regan, 256 A.D.2d 452).
ALTMAN, J.P., COZIER, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.