From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britton v. Bullen

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 5, 1925
106 So. 138 (Ala. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 780.

November 5, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; Charles P. Almon, Judge.

Thos. J. Carey, of Haleyville, for appellant.

In view of the decision, it is not necessary that briefs be here set out.

Travis Williams, of Russellville, for appellee.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The supersedeas and bill of exceptions in this cause were approved and the latter signed September 24, 1924. Eight months later the transcript was filed in the Court of Appeals. But this was six months after the time limited by law for the filing of the transcript (Code 1923, § 6107), and four days after appellee's motion to affirm had been submitted for decision. The court may for good cause shown extend the time for filing the transcript (Code, § 6103), and may excuse default. But appellant's affidavit offers no sufficient excuse for the great delay shown in this case. It is, generally, that counsel was busy in the various courts attended by him; but this by no means sufficiently accounts for the failure for eight months to file the transcript of the record in the Court of Appeals.

Appellee's motion to affirm must be granted.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Britton v. Bullen

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 5, 1925
106 So. 138 (Ala. 1925)
Case details for

Britton v. Bullen

Case Details

Full title:BRITTON v. BULLEN

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 5, 1925

Citations

106 So. 138 (Ala. 1925)
213 Ala. 659

Citing Cases

State v. Barton

In appeals in equity cases appellant must file transcript in Supreme Court within 60 days from date of taking…

Parker v. Bedwell

Cite: Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 22, Tit. 7, §§ 769, 770; Supreme Court Rule 41, Code 1940, Tit. 7, p. 1019;…