From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britt v. Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CA 08-02508.

June 5, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered April 11, 2008. The order, inter alia, granted a stay of the action pending resolution of a related federal action.

GLENN E. MURRAY, BUFFALO, FOR plaintiff's-APPELLANTS.

COLUCCI GALLAHER, P.C., BUFFALO (JOHN J. MARCHESE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, ELAINE GARBE, SUPERVISOR, BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND BISILOLA F. JACKSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JERELENE ELIZABETH GIWA.

FELDMAN, KIEFFER HERMAN, LLP, BUFFALO (ADAM C. FERRANDINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS GRACE MANOR HEALTH CARE FACILITY, INC., DAVID J. GENTNER, MARY STEPHAN, KATHY RANDALL, AND TIFFANY MATTHEWS.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the alternative relief sought by defendants in their respective CPLR 3211 (a) (4) motions, i.e., to stay the action pending the outcome of a related federal action ( see CPLR 2201; see generally Asher v Abbott Labs., 307 AD2d 211). A stay may be warranted based on "due consideration of issues of comity, orderly procedure, and judicial economy" where there is substantial identity of the issues, relief sought, and parties in the state and federal actions ( id. at 211; see Finger Lakes Racing Assn. v New York Racing Assn., 28 AD3d 1208, 1209), and that is the case here. Plaintiffs contention that the case should be assigned to a different justice based on the court's alleged bias is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not preserved for our review ( see William Kaufman Org. v Graham James, 269 AD2d 171, 174; Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). In any event, that contention is without merit ( see generally William Kaufman Org., 269 AD2d at 174).


Summaries of

Britt v. Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Britt v. Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN BRITT, Individually and as Executor of LULA BAITY, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4525
879 N.Y.S.2d 764

Citing Cases

Salisbury v. Christian

The liability of CNB is vicarious and thus is inseparable from the liability of the Christian defendants (…

Joseph v. Kenneth G. Kasper et al

We reject plaintiffs further contention on his appeal that the court erred in granting that part of…