From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briones v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01172 (W.D. La. Apr. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01172

04-28-2017

JORGE BRIONES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

Before the court are the Report and Recommendation, (Rec. Doc. 6), of the Magistrate Judge and the Objection to the Report and Recommendation, (Rec. Doc. 7), filed by the petitioner. After an independent review of the record and a de novo determination of the issues, and determining that the findings of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (Rec. Doc. 6), of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application for writ of habeas corpus (Rec. Doc. 4) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Alexandria, Louisiana, this 28th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Briones v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01172 (W.D. La. Apr. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Briones v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:JORGE BRIONES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01172 (W.D. La. Apr. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

DeLeon v. Rios

Indeed, many federal inmates sanctioned for Rule 108 violations have received penalties much more severe than…