From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinster v. Sklar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-28-2016

In the Matter of Christopher BRINSTER, appellant, v. Tami D. SKLAR, respondent.

Gail Jacobs, Great Neck, NY, for appellant.


Gail Jacobs, Great Neck, NY, for appellant.

Appeal by the father from a corrected order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Elaine Jackson Stack, J.H.O.), dated December 23, 2014. The corrected order dismissed the father's petition alleging a violation of an order of visitation. The father's assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant. ORDERED that the corrected order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brinster v. Sklar

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Brinster v. Sklar

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Christopher BRINSTER, appellant, v. Tami D. SKLAR…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
37 N.Y.S.3d 906
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6210