From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briley v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 24, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11CV00274 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11CV00274 BSM/BD

04-24-2013

EDDIE BRILEY, JR. ADC #116921 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 47] and the filed objections [Doc. No. 48] have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 41] is granted.

2. Plaintiff Eddie Briley, Jr.'s claims against defendants in their official capacities for money damages are dismissed with prejudice.

3. Briley's remaining claims against defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Briley v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 24, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11CV00274 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Briley v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE BRILEY, JR. ADC #116921 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11CV00274 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 24, 2013)