From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bright v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 4, 2009
ACTION No. 08-1196-MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

ACTION No. 08-1196-MLB.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge Donald Bostwick, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bright v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 4, 2009
ACTION No. 08-1196-MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Bright v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN L. BRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

ACTION No. 08-1196-MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Harmon v. Colvin

Thus, an ALJ's credibility determination "cannot be based on an intangible or intuitive notion about an…

Garcia v. Colvin

It has long been held that "sporadic performance of household tasks or work does not establish that a person…