Opinion
Argued December 6, 1887
Decided December 20, 1887
William H. Henderson for appellant.
Worthington Frothingham for respondents.
ANDREWS, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Briggs v. Langford
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1887
14 N.E. 502 (N.Y. 1887)
Summaries of
Briggs v. Langford
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1887
14 N.E. 502 (N.Y. 1887)
Case details for
Briggs v. Langford
Case Details
Full title:ARBA BRIGGS, Appellant, v . JOHN LANGFORD et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 20, 1887
Citations
14 N.E. 502 (N.Y. 1887)
14 N.E. 502
12 N.Y. St. Rptr. 461
Citing Cases
Sparling v. Wells
( Baird v. Baird, 145 N.Y. 659.) Even if the plaintiff was a bona fide purchaser, she would not be exempt…
Wood v. TravisIt seems to be the law in this state that the purchaser of a nonnegotiable chose in action, such as a…