From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brickman v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1982
444 N.E.2d 979 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued October 4, 1982

Decided November 16, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, LOUIS GROSSMAN, J.

Raymond T. Munsell, Paul Windells, Jr., and Kenneth W. Greenawalt for appellant.

Jon Paul Robbins and Herbert L. Brickman, pro se, for Herbert L. Brickman, respondent.



On defendant's appeal: Order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Presiding Justice FRANCIS T. MURPHY, JR., at the Appellate Division on the earlier appeal ( 66 A.D.2d 737-740).

On plaintiff's appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, as academic in view of the disposition made on defendant's appeal.

Concur: Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER. Taking no part: Chief Judge COOKE.


Summaries of

Brickman v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1982
444 N.E.2d 979 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Brickman v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT L. BRICKMAN, Appellant-Respondent, v. F.W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 16, 1982

Citations

444 N.E.2d 979 (N.Y. 1982)
444 N.E.2d 979
458 N.Y.S.2d 515

Citing Cases

Stapleton Studios, LLC v. City of New York

General Obligations Law § 5-703 also requires a writing for any lease of real property greater than one year.…

King David Associates v. Schonberger

The court properly granted partial summary judgment to the respondents on their fourth cause of action for…