From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bretz v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 3, 1972
190 S.E.2d 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

47044.

ARGUED APRIL 3, 1972.

DECIDED MAY 3, 1972. REHEARING DENIED MAY 25, 1972.

Appellate procedure. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Holt.

Olin Rambo, Paul T. O'Connor, for appellant.

Powell, Goldstein, Frazer Murphy, Robert W. Patrick, Jerry B. Blackstock, for appellees.


The notice of appeal was filed on October 15, 1971. Within 30 days thereafter the appellant must cause the transcript to be filed unless an extension of time has been granted by the trial judge under the Appellate Practice Act, § 6 ( Code Ann. § 6-804; Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, et seq.). The transcript was not filed in the lower court until January 20, 1972, and the record does not disclose any extension of time. Counsel for the appellant insists that the recent amendment of our Rule 11, adding subsection c, thereto, which states that unless the opposing party objects to the failure of the appellant to comply with the provisions of the Appellate Practice Act relating to the filing of the transcript in the trial court prior to transmittal, the appellee has waived the failure of the appellant to comply. This addition to our rule was adopted March 2, 1972. The record and transcript were filed in this court on January 24, 1972, hence the appellee could not have waived any right to object in this court as this rule was not even in existence at that time. See in this connection Abel v. J. H. Harvey Co., 126 Ga. App. 115.

Appeal dismissed. Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 3, 1972 — DECIDED MAY 3, 1972 — REHEARING DENIED MAY 25, 1972.


Summaries of

Bretz v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 3, 1972
190 S.E.2d 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Bretz v. Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:BRETZ v. FITZGERALD et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 3, 1972

Citations

190 S.E.2d 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
190 S.E.2d 619

Citing Cases

Gilmore v. State

" Code Ann. § 6-804 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21). "[The Supreme Court] has repeatedly held that the provisions…