From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brennan v. Barnhart

United States District Court, D. Maine
Feb 6, 2006
Civil No. 05-123-P-S (D. Me. Feb. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-123-P-S.

February 6, 2006

TAMMY D. BRENNAN represented by REMINGTON O. SCHMIDT, PORTLAND, ME.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER represented by ESKUNDER BOYD, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, REGION I, BOSTON, MA.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 25, 2006, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 23). Defendant filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 24) on January 30, 2006. Plaintiff filed her Response to Recommended Decision (Docket No. 25) on January 30, 2006.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. The Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration (AC Errors) (Docket No. 9) is GRANTED. The Motion to Remand to SSA Pursuant to Sentence 6 (Docket No. 6) is MOOT. The Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration ( Consolidation) is MOOT.


Summaries of

Brennan v. Barnhart

United States District Court, D. Maine
Feb 6, 2006
Civil No. 05-123-P-S (D. Me. Feb. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Brennan v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY D. BRENNAN, Plaintiff v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Feb 6, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-123-P-S (D. Me. Feb. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Staples v. Berryhill

Second, the plaintiff's attorney's familiarity with the case should have resulted in greater efficiencies.…