From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 16, 1996.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for abuse of process, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated October 20, 1995, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to preclude him from using any audio tapes at trial to impeach witnesses. Justice Thompson has been substituted for the late Justice Hart ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Before: Miller, J.P., Thompson, Altman and Goldstein, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to preclude the defendant from using any audio tapes at trial to impeach witnesses is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in holding that the defendant was precluded from using any audio tapes at trial to impeach witnesses on the ground that the defendant secretly recorded conversations he had with the plaintiffs and nonparty witnesses. These tapes are admissible if they are relevant and material ( see, DiMichel v South Buffalo Ry. Co., 80 NY2d 184; Thomas v Fletcher Sons Auto Repair, 201 AD2d 554; DeCandia v Hudson Waterways, 194 AD2d 314; Kane v Her-Pet Refig., 181 AD2d 257) and their admission does not violate the rules of evidence.


Summaries of

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1996
234 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Breezy Point Cooperative, Inc. v. Young

Case Details

Full title:BREEZY POINT COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Respondents, v. THOMAS H. YOUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 121

Citing Cases

McDonald v. Justian

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements,…

A.S.L. Enterprises v. Venus Laboratories

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the…