Breaux v. Warden

Full title: DAVID A. BREAUX, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

2:93-cv-0570 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2015)

Opinion

DAVID A. BREAUX, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. No. 2:93-cv-0570 JAM DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 22, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner is a state prisoner incarcerated under sentence of death. He is proceeding through counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus.

         Petitioner has filed a motion for extensions of time in which to comply with the current scheduling order. Counsel for petitioner states that counsel for respondent does not oppose the proposed extensions. Therefore, good cause appearing, the motion will be granted.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extensions of time (Doc. No. 285) is granted. The current scheduling order (Doc. No. 282) is amended as follows:

         1. The parties have until December 15, 2015, in which to complete all independent investigation in this case.

         2. The parties shall submit no later than December 15, 2015, a joint proposed schedule and status report that shall include: (1) a proposed schedule for any depositions; (2) a proposed deadline for the filing of any pre-evidentiary hearing motions that either party deems appropriate; and (3) proposed dates for the evidentiary hearing.