From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bray v. Redman

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1856
6 Cal. 287 (Cal. 1856)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Santa Clara County.

         The Court below dismissed the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of a justice of the peace, on the ground that the fees of the justice had not been paid; and refused to allow the appellant in that Court to pay the fees, such as the Court might direct, to save dismissal of the appeal. Defendant appealed from the order of dismissal.

         COUNSEL

          Wm. T. Wallace, for Appellant.

          L. Archer, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Terry. Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         The Court below erred in admitting the decree in insolvency in evidence. It purports upon its face to have been made at Chambers in a different county from the one in which the proceeding was instituted. A discharge under the Insolvent Act is not a mere Chamber order, but the judgment of a Court, and should have been made in the county where the proceeding was instituted, unless changed to another by order of Court.

         This objection goes to the jurisdiction, and could properly be raised on the trial below.

         Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.


Summaries of

Bray v. Redman

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1856
6 Cal. 287 (Cal. 1856)
Case details for

Bray v. Redman

Case Details

Full title:BRAY v. REDMAN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1856

Citations

6 Cal. 287 (Cal. 1856)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Hamilton v. Harris

The provision was intended for his benefit. (Bray v. Redman , 6 Cal. 287.) This right he should assert by…

McDermott v. Douglass

If Justice sends up the papers without demanding his fees, their non-payment is no ground for a motion to…