Opinion
May 9, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).
The court properly determined the parties' responsibilities for support of their children in accordance with their respective means (Domestic Relations Law § 32; Family Ct Act § 413; Stern v Stern, 59 A.D.2d 857), and calculated the amount in accordance with the guidelines of the Child Support Standards Act and permissible deviation therefrom (Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c], [f]; Formato v Formato, 173 A.D.2d 274). Hearings were not necessary as such an award may be made on affidavits alone (Kassirer v Kassirer, 187 A.D.2d 309, 310), and defendant had previously submitted affidavits and financial statements. Further, to the extent any inequities exist, they may be remedied by a speedy trial (Aiello v Aiello, 196 A.D.2d 793).
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.