From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braun v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Mar 11, 2013
No. C 12-5786 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-5786 MEJ

03-11-2013

AXEL BRAUN, Plaintiff, v. PRIMARY DISTRIBUTOR DOE NUMBER 1 and DEFENDANT DOES 2 through 38, Defendants.


and related cases: 12-5812 MEJ

12-5813 MEJ

12-5814 MEJ


ORDER SEVERING ALL DOE

DEFENDANTS EXCEPT DOE 1 IN

ALL RELATED CASES


ORDER RE: RELATED CASES

On November 19, 2012, the Court related the above-captioned cases. The Court subsequently granted Plaintiff Axel Braun's Ex Parte Applications for Expedited Discovery. However, since that time, the Court has received statements from individual Doe Defendants, reviewed recent cases in this area, and has determined that joinder of all Doe Defendants is improper as individual issues are likely to predominate. Accordingly, all Does except Doe 1 are SEVERED from these related actions without prejudice to Plaintiff filing individual complaints against them. Further, as individual issues predominate, the Court shall remove the related case designation for these cases. Plaintiff shall prosecute all four cases against Doe 1 Defendants only, and the cases shall not be considered related. Any motions to quash and/or sever are denied as moot, with the exception of any motions to quash brought by a Doe 1 Defendant in any of the four cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Braun v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Mar 11, 2013
No. C 12-5786 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Braun v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:AXEL BRAUN, Plaintiff, v. PRIMARY DISTRIBUTOR DOE NUMBER 1 and DEFENDANT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-5786 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)