From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brasher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 18, 2015
160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 4D14–3031 4D14–4137.

03-18-2015

David BRASHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

David Brasher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


David Brasher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) ; Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Brasher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 18, 2015
160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Brasher v. State

Case Details

Full title:David BRASHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)