Brasher v. State

Full title: DAVID BRASHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

160 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 4D14–3031 4D14–4137.

2015-03-18

David BRASHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

David Brasher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeal of orders denying rule 3.800 and 3.850 motions from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12–15569CF10A.
David Brasher, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.