From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 5, 2002
817 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D02-1289.

June 5, 2002.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

Richard L. Brant, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


We affirm the denial of appellant Richard L. Brant's motion for post-conviction relief as to grounds 4 and 5. Denial of defense motions for acquittal, on the charges of possession with intent to sell and for aggravated assault on law enforcement, are not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g. Johnson v. State, 649 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (issue which can be brought on direct appeal not cognizable by motion for post conviction relief).


Summaries of

Brant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 5, 2002
817 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Brant v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. BRANT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 5, 2002

Citations

817 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Benjamin v. Crosby

Tower v. Phillips, 7 F.3d 206, 210 (11th Cir. 1993). The constitutional dimension of Benjamin's issue…