From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brandes v. North Shore University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 2005
22 A.D.3d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-06485.

October 3, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff Pamela Brandes, individually and as a personal representative of the estate of Robert Brandes, deceased, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated June 23, 2004, which sustained the objections of the defendants North Shore University Hospital, I. Michael Leitman, Sharon McLaughlin, Larry Frankini, and Robert Allen Cherry, to certain questions she propounded to nonparty Kimlyn C. Long during her examination before trial.

Norman Leonard Cousins, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Fumuso Kelly DeVerna Snyder Swart Farrell, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Scott G. Christesen of counsel), for respondents North Shore University Hospital, I. Michael Leitman, Sharon McLaughlin, Larry Frankini, and Robert Allen Cherry, and nonparty-respondent Kimlyn C. Long.

McHenry, Horan Lapping, P.C., Syossett, N.Y. (Judith Pilatsky of counsel), for respondents Leo John Penzi and James P. Palma, and nonparty-respondent Laura W. McIntosh.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In an unsigned transcript dated May 24, 2004, the Supreme Court purportedly sustained objections to certain deposition questions propounded by the plaintiff to nonparty Laura W. McIntosh. Contrary to the plaintiff's representation in her notice of appeal from an order dated June 23, 2004, the Supreme Court's rulings regarding McIntosh were never reduced to a written order. Nor were those rulings encompassed within the order dated June 23, 2004. Accordingly, the plaintiff cannot now raise contentions regarding objections to McIntosh's testimony ( see Ojeda v. Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717; Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr Corp., 100 AD2d 509).

With regard to the plaintiff's appeal from the order dated June 23, 2004, the Supreme Court properly sustained the objections at issue, which were made when the plaintiff's counsel sought expert opinions from nonparty Kimlyn C. Long ( see Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hosp., 239 AD2d 315).

The plaintiff's contention that a special referee should be appointed to oversee future examinations before trial is improperly raised for the first time on appeal ( see Storchevoy v. Blinderman, 303 AD2d 672).


Summaries of

Brandes v. North Shore University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 2005
22 A.D.3d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Brandes v. North Shore University Hospital

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA BRANDES, Appellant, v. NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7334
802 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

Mahaney v. Neuroscience Center

Accordingly, Battaglia established its entitlement to summary judgment. The contention raised by the…

Jones v. Cummings

Accordingly, the language in the plaintiffs amended complaint and amended bill of particulars which sought to…