From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 11, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A party seeking to vacate a judgment or order entered upon the movant's default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and make a prima facie showing of legal merit (see, Perellie v Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903; Passalacqua v Banat, 103 A.D.2d 769; County Asphalt v North Rockland Underground Corp., 96 A.D.2d 570; Blake v City of New York, 90 A.D.2d 531). In this case the plaintiff did neither. Therefore, the court properly refused to set aside the default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015. Thompson, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR BRANCOVEANU, Appellant, v. MARIANA BRANCOVEANU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 694

Citing Cases

Shapiro v. Ray

In this case the defendant did neither. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion…

Nesky v. Nesky

A noncustodial parent may promptly move to suspend a child support obligation prospectively. (Joseph A. v…