From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branch Banking & Tr. v. E. Jersey Commercial, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Apr 15, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-13940 (MAS) (DEA) (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-13940 (MAS) (DEA)

04-15-2020

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST, Plaintiff, v. EAST JERSEY COMMERCIAL, LLC, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust's ("Plaintiff") Motion for Default Judgment against East Jersey Commercial, LLC ("Defendant"). (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff brought suit against Defendant for breach of contract, seeking to collect a delinquent promissory note issued to Defendant on August 28, 2008. (Compl. ¶ 19, ECF No. 1.)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 allows a court "to enter a default judgment against a properly served defendant who fails to file a timely responsive pleading." Chanel, Inc. v. Gordashevsky, 558 F. Supp. 2d 532, 535 (D.N.J. 2008). "A court obtains personal jurisdiction over the parties when the complaint and summons are properly served upon the defendant. Effective service of process is therefore a prerequisite to proceeding further in a case." Lampe v. Xouth, Inc., 952 F.2d 697, 700-01 (3d Cir. 1991). An unincorporated association, such as a limited liability company, must be served by "delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B).

Plaintiff's Complaint alleges that Defendant "is a Delaware limited liability corporation [sic] organized to do business in the State of New Jersey with its principal place of business at 29 Hulse Landing Road, Brick, New Jersey 08723." (Compl. ¶ 2.) Plaintiff requested that the Clerk issue a summons for Defendant, care of Anthony Carlini of Handel & Carlini, LLP located at 85 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 201A in Poughkeepsie, New York. (ECF No. 1-6.) Plaintiff's Acknowledgement of Service filed with the Court states that Plaintiff served process personally upon Defendant at 39 Hornbeck Ridge in Poughkeepsie, New York, but does not specify who was personally served. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff's Certificates of Service accompanying its Motion for Default and its Motion for Default Judgment state that the motions were sent via Certified U.S. Mail to "Trish Beck c/o [Defendant]" at 39 Hornbeck Ridge in Poughkeepsie, New York. (Certificate of Service, Mot. Default, ECF No. 5-2; Certificate of Service, Mot. Default J., ECF No. 6-12.)

In support of its Motion for Default Judgment, Plaintiff only states that it "caused Defendant to be served with a copy of the Summons, Complaint[,] and related documents by process server. Service of process was accomplished as to Defendant . . . ." (Carobus Cert. ¶ 4. ECF No. 6-4; see also Pl.'s Moving Br. 2, ECF No. 6-2.) Plaintiff, however, fails to specify whether either Anthony Carlini or Trish Beck is an "officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process," Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B), and fails to provide any other sufficient basis for the Court to determine that service upon either Anthony Carlini or Trish Beck allows this Court to exercise jurisdiction over Defendant.

Because Defendant is an unincorporated business entity, and Plaintiff fails to provide adequate proofs that Plaintiff properly served process upon Defendant, the Court is unable to determine its jurisdiction over Defendant. As the issue of service is a threshold issue, the Court does not reach other potential issues with Plaintiff's Motion.

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS on this 15th day of April 2020, hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 6) is DENIED without prejudice.

2. By May 15th 2020, Plaintiff may either serve Defendant or file a renewed motion for default judgment accompanied by a Certification that provides a sufficient basis for the Court to determine its jurisdiction over Defendant.

3. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant by May 15th , 2020 and file proof of service with the Court.

/s/ _________

MICHAEL A. SHIPP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Branch Banking & Tr. v. E. Jersey Commercial, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Apr 15, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-13940 (MAS) (DEA) (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Branch Banking & Tr. v. E. Jersey Commercial, LLC

Case Details

Full title:BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST, Plaintiff, v. EAST JERSEY COMMERCIAL, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Apr 15, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-13940 (MAS) (DEA) (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2020)

Citing Cases

Innovasian Cuisine Enters. v. Taco

Accordingly, notwithstanding whether Defendant is an unincorporated or incorporated entity, the Court finds…

Finvest Capital Fund, Inc. v. Solid Box, LLC

The Court thus finds that service of process was proper. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(A) & (h)(1)(B); see also…