From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brady v. Rudin Management Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
180 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1962

Decided January 25, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, LOUIS J. CAPOZZOLI, J.

Patrick E. Gibbons for appellant.

Martin M. Kolbrener and Morris H. Bergreen for respondent.


Order reversed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative upon the ground that, under the allegations of the complaint, the three-year Statute of Limitations applies because the defendant's duty to repair existed at common law and the liability is not one created by statute. (Cf. Lorberblatt v. Gerst, 10 N.Y.2d 244; Rogers v. Frooks, 10 N.Y.2d 911; De Clara v. Barber S.S. Lines, 309 N.Y. 620.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Brady v. Rudin Management Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
180 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Brady v. Rudin Management Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEONA H. BRADY, Respondent, v. RUDIN MANAGEMENT CO., INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1962

Citations

180 N.E.2d 910 (N.Y. 1962)
180 N.E.2d 910
225 N.Y.S.2d 757

Citing Cases

Rodriquez v. Levin

If, on the other hand, the plaintiff's cause of action, as plaintiff contends, is created by section 78 Mult.…

Pitt v. City of New York

Subdivision 2 of section 48 of the Civil Practice Act applied when the liability did not exist at common law,…