From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brady v. Plano Hous. Authority/K. Teague

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 25, 2024
Civil Action 4:22-CV-01020-SDJ-AGD (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:22-CV-01020-SDJ-AGD

09-25-2024

SANDRA B. BRADY, Plaintiff, v. PLANO HOUSING AUTHORITY/K. TEAGUE, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING IN PART THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SEAN D. JORDAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report, (Dkt. #13), contains proposed findings of fact and the recommendation that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #10) be denied and that Plaintiff be ordered to amend her Complaint, in a manner that complies with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, within fourteen days of the Court's adoption of the Report.

Having received the Report, and no timely objections being filed, the Court determines that the findings and conclusions contained in the Report should be ADOPTED in part and MODIFIED in part. The Court adopts all the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions, except her conclusion that the motion to dismiss must be denied. Because Plaintiff's claim is inadequately pleaded for the reasons explained in the Report, the Court finds that Defendants' motion should be granted as to the dismissal of Plaintiff's claim but denied as to Defendants' request that Plaintiff's claim be dismissed with prejudice. It is the practice of this Court to afford litigants at least one opportunity to cure pleading deficiencies before dismissing a case, unless it is clear that the defects are incurable. See, e.g., Brady v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, 2023 WL 6393882, at *6 (E.D. Tex. 2023).

Defendants requested that the Court dismiss the Complaint “in its entirety,” which the Court will construe as requesting that it be dismissed with prejudice. (Dkt. #10 at 5).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #10) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and that Plaintiff's Complaint, (Dkt. #1), is DISMISSED without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this order to amend her complaint in a manner that complies with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If an amended complaint is filed, Defendants may move once more to dismiss such amended complaint if they have grounds to do so. If Plaintiff fails to amend her pleading within fourteen days, Defendants may move for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41.

So ORDERED and SIGNED


Summaries of

Brady v. Plano Hous. Authority/K. Teague

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 25, 2024
Civil Action 4:22-CV-01020-SDJ-AGD (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Brady v. Plano Hous. Authority/K. Teague

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA B. BRADY, Plaintiff, v. PLANO HOUSING AUTHORITY/K. TEAGUE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 4:22-CV-01020-SDJ-AGD (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2024)