Opinion
1255 CA 19-01849
04-30-2021
DIBBLE & MILLER, P.C., ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH S. NACCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
DIBBLE & MILLER, P.C., ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH S. NACCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, WINSLOW, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Brady v. Brady, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 143 N.Y.S.3d 238 (4th Dept. 2021).