From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradsher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 11, 2003
841 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 5D02-2058.

Opinion filed April 11, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Shawn L. Briese, Judge.

Raymond M. Warren of Warren Warren, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Bradsher appeals from his final judgment and sentence after he entered into a negotiated plea bargain and pled guilty to false imprisonment and aggravated assault. He claims that based on the Faison decision he could not be convicted and sentenced for both false imprisonment and aggravated assault, under the facts of this case. We affirm.

Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1983).

We do not reach the merits of this argument because Bradsher bargained for his plea agreement with the state, which was honored. As a result, he received a lenient sentence for these crimes. Under these circumstances, he waived any right to challenge his convictions and sentences. Novation v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1994).

Were we to reach the merits of this argument, the result would be the same. First because the Florida Supreme Court has now held that the Faison test does not apply to the offense of false imprisonment. State v. Smith, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S120 (Fla., Feb. 6, 2003).

Second, if Faison applied to this case, as the state, defense and trial judge thought at the time of sentencing, the record would permit the false imprisonment charge to stand. The judge held five sentencing hearings, at which the testimony of the victim, witnesses, and the defendant were taken. He concluded, and the testimonies adequately support his findings:

The false imprisonment in this case was not slight, inconsequential, and merely incidental to the aggravated assault and was not in the inherent nature of the aggravated assault, and the confinement had a significance independent of the aggravated assault, such that it made the aggravated assault substantially easier to commit, the Faison test having been met.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, CJ., and ORFINGER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bradsher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 11, 2003
841 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Bradsher v. State

Case Details

Full title:BURTON BRADSHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 11, 2003

Citations

841 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Statton v. State

Affirmed. See Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994); Safrany v. State, 895 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Simmons v. State

Affirmed. See Bolender v. State, 658 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1995);Sanders v. State, 793 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA…