From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Randall

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jul 8, 1997
696 A.2d 1323 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Bradley v. Randall, 45 Conn.App. 924, 696 A.2d 1323, cert. denied, 243 Conn. 923, 701 A.2d 339 (1997), in a per curiam opinion, we affirmed a trial court's decision, which held that a municipality cannot be an apportionment defendant based on allegations of injuries caused by a defective highway.

Summary of this case from Priore v. Longo-McLean
See 1 Summary

Opinion

(AC 16301)

Argued June 6, 1997

Officially released July 8, 1997

Appeal by the named defendant et al. from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Windham at Putnam, Sferrazza, J.

Summaries of

Bradley v. Randall

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jul 8, 1997
696 A.2d 1323 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997)

In Bradley v. Randall, 45 Conn.App. 924, 696 A.2d 1323, cert. denied, 243 Conn. 923, 701 A.2d 339 (1997), in a per curiam opinion, we affirmed a trial court's decision, which held that a municipality cannot be an apportionment defendant based on allegations of injuries caused by a defective highway.

Summary of this case from Priore v. Longo-McLean
Case details for

Bradley v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:MARYLOU BRADLEY v. TIMOTHY P. RANDALL ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 8, 1997

Citations

696 A.2d 1323 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997)
45 Conn. App. 924

Citing Cases

Priore v. Longo-Mclean

34 Conn. L. Rptr., at 558. See Bradley v. Randall, 45 Conn.App. 924, 696 A.2d 1323, cert. denied, 243 Conn.…

Priore v. Longo-McLean

” Smith v. New Haven, supra, 258 Conn. at 62, 779 A.2d 104. In Bradley v. Randall, 45 Conn.App. 924, 696 A.2d…

2 Citing Cases