From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Ibex Construction LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 2005
22 A.D.3d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Summary

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Worbes Corp. v. Sebrow

Opinion

6836.

October 20, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered April 21, 2005, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants-respondents' liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to grant plaintiffs leave to renew the motions after completion of disclosure, and otherwise affirmed, with separate bills of costs, payable by plaintiffs.

Paul F. McAloon, New York, for appellants.

French Rafter, LLP, New York (Howard K. Fishman of counsel), for Ibex Construction LLC, respondent.

D'Amato Lynch, New York (Arturo M. Boutin of counsel), for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and 23rd Street Properties, LLC, respondents.

Fabiani Cohen, LLP, New York (Lisa A. Sokoloff of counsel), for Ruttura Sons Construction Co., respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.


The motions, which were made before a preliminary conference had been held and before defendants had any opportunity to obtain disclosure, were properly denied as premature under the circumstances presented ( see McGlynn v. Palace Co., 262 AD2d 116). However, plaintiffs should have been granted leave to renew after completion of disclosure ( see id.), and we modify accordingly.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Ibex Construction LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 2005
22 A.D.3d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Worbes Corp. v. Sebrow

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Titumir v. Barker Ave. Estates

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Queens W. Dev. Corp.

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Preston v. City of New York

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Espada v. City of N.Y.

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Hennessy v. City of N.Y.

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Hennessy v. City of N.Y.

In Bradley, the court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as premature, when the same was made prior to the preliminary conference (Bradley at 380).

Summary of this case from Lebron v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

Bradley v. Ibex Construction LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BRADLEY et al., Appellants, v. IBEX CONSTRUCTION LLC, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7807
801 N.Y.S.2d 901

Citing Cases

JPMorgan Chase Funding, Inc. v. Cohan

As such, summary judgment is improper for the reasons stated herein. Further, a motion for summary judgment…

Worbes Corp. v. Sebrow

Notwithstanding the foregoing, CPLR § 3212(f) mandates denial of a motion for summary judgment when a motion…