From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13cv454 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13cv454

11-08-2013

JULIA L. BOYLE, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT, LLC, Defendants.


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**


Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 3, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to Denton County District Court [Doc. #9] be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to Denton County District Court [Doc. #9] is DENIED.

_________________________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Boyle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13cv454 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Boyle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:JULIA L. BOYLE, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13cv454 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Logan v. Matveevskii

Thus, because there is no private right of action to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 8.22, the Court dismisses any claims…

Logan v. Matveevskii

Thus, because there is no private right of action to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 8.22, the Court dismisses any claims…