From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Keith

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 20, 1997
954 S.W.2d 942 (Ark. 1997)

Opinion

97-991

Opinion delivered November 20, 1997

MANDAMUS — PETITION GRANTED — RESPONDENT REQUIRED TO ACT UPON PETITIONER'S REQUEST. — The supreme court granted petitioner's requested writ of mandamus to require that the circuit court act upon petitioner's Freedom of Information Act request for copies of records allegedly in the files of the circuit court.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus; granted.

Appellant, pro se.

No response.


Petitioner Stanley Frank Boyd, a prisoner in the Arkansas Department of Correction, states that on April 2, 1997, he filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Honorable Tom Keith, Carroll County Circuit Judge. The request sought copies of records allegedly in the files of the Circuit Court. The matter apparently remains pending before the Circuit Court. Petitioner Boyd seeks a writ of mandamus to cause Judge Keith to grant his request.

The Attorney General, on behalf of Judge Keith, has responded by denying that the request has merit rather than addressing the Circuit Court's failure to act on the request.

[1] The writ of mandamus is granted to require only that the Circuit Court act upon the request of Mr. Boyd.


Summaries of

Boyd v. Keith

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 20, 1997
954 S.W.2d 942 (Ark. 1997)
Case details for

Boyd v. Keith

Case Details

Full title:Stanley Frank BOYD v . Honorable Tom KEITH

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 20, 1997

Citations

954 S.W.2d 942 (Ark. 1997)
954 S.W.2d 942

Citing Cases

Opinion No. 2003-376

Mandamus may also be an appropriate remedy. See generally Arkansas State Police Comm. v. Davidson, 252 Ark.…

Opinion No. 2006-086

There is also some suggestion in the case law that a writ of mandamus may be an appropriate remedy. See…