From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowry v. Uptown Gift Shop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 2002
292 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

506

March 19, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered November 1, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of a slip and fall on sidewalk debris in front of defendant's store, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

LARRY WALLACE, for plaintiff-respondent.

MARTIN J. MOSKOWITZ, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ.


Summary judgment in defendant's favor is precluded by an issue of fact as to whether the plastic strap on which plaintiff allegedly slipped had been wrapped around one of the boxes that defendant used to display merchandise on the sidewalk. We reject defendant's argument that the existence of a corner newsstand, a frequently overflowing nearby garbage can and other possible sources of the strap requires summary judgment in its favor (compare, Hernandez v. Menstown Stores, 289 A.D.2d 139, 735 N.Y.S.2d 55; Stephens v. J J Hat Ctr., 248 A.D.2d 270; Montalvo v. Western Estates, 240 A.D.2d 45, 47-48). Evidence that plaintiff fell very close to defendant's display is significant (compare, Cregan v. Greenlawn Plaza Corp., 269 A.D.2d 418).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Bowry v. Uptown Gift Shop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 2002
292 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Bowry v. Uptown Gift Shop

Case Details

Full title:LETITIA BOWRY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UPTOWN GIFT SHOP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

Lee v. King

Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. Defendants did not demonstrate their entitlement to…

Early v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Thus, here as in Xerri, since the accident did not occur or Waldorf Astoria's properly, but on the public…