From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BOWLING v. CITY OF EL PASO

Supreme Court of Texas
Dec 10, 1975
529 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. 1975)

Summary

reserving the question whether a failure to comply with the statutory requirements renders the transaction void or voidable

Summary of this case from Soncy Road Property v. Chapman

Opinion

No. B — 5525.

October 22, 1975. Rehearing Denied December 10, 1975.

Appeal from the 168th Judicial District Court, El Paso County, Rodriguez, J.

Warren Burnett, Associated, Richard J. Clarkson, Odessa, Collins, Langford Pine, John A. Langford and Charles E. Vinson, El Paso, for petitioners.

Peticolas, Luscombe, Stephens Windle, Harry Lee Hudspeth, El Paso, for respondent.


This is a suit by the City of El Paso to have declared void and to rescind a 1972 exchange of city owned lands for lands owned by R. L. Bowling and othes who were named as defendants in the trial court. The City alleged noncompliance with Art. 5421c — 12, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., grossly inadequate consideration, and an unconstitutional donation of public property.

At the close of all the evidence the trial court withdrew the case from the jury and granted the City's motion for an instructed verdict based on the application of Art. 5421c — 12. The court of civil appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment that the deed of the City be nullified, cancelled, set aside and declared wholly void and that the deeds of the other parties to the transaction likewise be voided. The court of civil appeals' holding was based upon failure by the City of El Paso to publish notice of the land transfer as required by Art. 5421c — 12. 525 S.W.2d 539.

While approving the judgment of court of civil appeals, we reserve the question whether a failure to comply with these statutory notice requirements renders such a transfer void or voidable.

The applications for writs of error are refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

BOWLING v. CITY OF EL PASO

Supreme Court of Texas
Dec 10, 1975
529 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. 1975)

reserving the question whether a failure to comply with the statutory requirements renders the transaction void or voidable

Summary of this case from Soncy Road Property v. Chapman
Case details for

BOWLING v. CITY OF EL PASO

Case Details

Full title:R. L. BOWLING et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF EL PASO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Dec 10, 1975

Citations

529 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. 1975)

Citing Cases

Walker v. City of Georgetown

As in the previous section, the plain language of the statute indicates that the Legislature intended for the…

Soncy Road Property v. Chapman

There are no Texas cases construing the interest, if any, that abutting landowners have in parcels of land to…